Twitter Government, the team at Twitter responsible for monitoring and analyzing government and election conversations, noted that Trump dominated share of voice at 64 percent. The content was more or less what we expected out of a debate. That is to say, we learned very little about each of the candidates and even less about their policies.
One thing we did learn, or what was at least reinforced from an internal communications perspective, is the need for a consistent platform that can push unified messaging to voters. The lack of cohesion between Trump and Indiana Governor Mike Pence on their policies around the humanitarian crisis in Aleppo was on full display Sunday, and is one of many discrepancies in responses each has given to the media since Pence was named to the ticket. (Here’s a link to the Washington Post’s Trump/Pence divergence tracker, which lists at least 17 points in the last couple months where the two publicly diverged on messaging).
Toward the end of the debate, ABC News Chief Global Affairs Correspondent Martha Raddatz questioned Trump and Clinton about how they would handle the crisis in Aleppo (here’s the full transcript). After Raddatz reminded Trump of Pence’s comments, which are also available in the transcript, Trump said, “OK. He and I haven’t spoken, and I disagree. I disagree.”
Trump went on to elucidate his disagreement with Pence. Then, Monday on CNN, Gov. Pence disagreed that he and Trump disagreed, commenting that Raddatz had misrepresented his statements. Even if that’s the case, Trump’s outburst Sunday is problematic, if for no other reason than he publicly admitted that he hadn’t spoken to his vice presidential candidate on a major policy issue.
Then, former CIA Director James Woolsey, who advises the Trump campaign on national security, refused to clarify the campaign’s position on Aleppo, telling CNN, “I’m not telling you one way or the other. The candidates are the ones who are going to communicate the policy decisions to the public, not me.”
Presidential nominees and their running mates or advisers disagree all the time on policy and approach, but it’s rare to see this much discord and open disagreement on messaging in a political campaign.
Sure, there will be some disagreement or movement on policy and the issues, but much of that happens behind closed doors, not in a national debate with tens of millions of viewers. Like any brand or business, it’s critical for a campaign to push a unified messaging platform that can a) help audiences get a grasp on your real position with clarity; and b) inspire them to believe you’re going to do what you say you’re going to do.
Instead, audiences are left confused and distrustful of a campaign’s platform and messaging.
Do you think the GOP ticket’s convoluted messaging is pushing enough voters away to cost Trump the election in a landslide? Sound off in the comments below.
Photo credit: The Atlantic